Are you the best?

This morning I received a phone call from an applicant to a position I’ve been working with for one of my clients.  The question she asked me is one I hear on a regular basis regarding hiring decisions.  It’s always some variable of the following:

 

“I applied for X position and I received a no-thanks letter.  I can’t understand why I’ve been eliminated because I’m highly qualified for the position. Can you tell me why the hiring managers aren’t interested in me?”

 

Interestingly, these questions are often coming from younger candidates, folks who have recently graduated from school or have been in the workforce for only a few years.  This shouldn’t really be a surprise given a recent study that confirmed many recruiting and HR professional’s suspicions.

 

From the following article, ‘Gen Y's Ego Trip Takes a Nasty Turn’ as published in the LA Times (Gen Y's Ego Trip) :

 

“An Associate Professor at S.D. State University, Jean Twenge, and four other researchers from the University of Michigan, University of Georgia and University of South Alabama, looked at the results of psychological surveys taken by more than 16,000 college students across the country over more than 25 years.

 

The Narcissistic Personality Inventory asks students to react ot such statements as: “If I ruled the world, it would be a better place,” “I think I’m a special person” and “I like to be the center of attention.”

 

The study found that almost two-thirds of recent college students had narcissism scores that were above the average 1982 score.  Thirty percent more college students showed elevated narcissism in 2006 than in 1982.

 

…researchers warn that a rising ego rush could cause personal and social problems for the Millennial Generation, also called Gen Y.  People with an inflated sense of self tend to have less interest in emotionally intimate bonds and can lash out when rejected or insulted.”

 

If I could be 100% honest with the candidates that ask me that question, in most cases I’d want to say, “You’re delusional in your expectations and you over-estimate your own abilities”.  Ouch.

 

I’m reminded of when I was speeding towards graduation from college.  There was a time, thankfully a brief period, when I would answer “management” when someone asked me what I wanted to do after graduation.  Somehow I had come to believe that management was something I could just do, not something I had to work my way into.  I had taken a class called Leadership, which means I had all the answers, right?  I wish I had someone willing to tell me I was being delusional in my aspirations just like I wish I could offer that admonishment to the candidates that call me.

 

The problem is that candidates all too often are forgetting that there is a 2nd side to the equation (providing further evidence that candidates are self-centered).  Even if the candidate is very talented and has relevant experience, he or she must try to anticipate and understand the wants/needs/goals of the hiring team.  The position description might provide clues, of course, as it will list many skills and competencies required for success in the position.  Those clues provide only some of the answers.

 

What can you find out about the organization in the press?  From people you know in the organization?  Does the hiring team have time to groom someone for future success or must they hire someone who can succeed from day one?  What was not included in the position posting that you think should have been?

 

The hiring team is looking for very specific things in their search.  While you as a candidate may fit some or even many of those desires, you likely will not meet all of their needs.  That’s why, for many job openings, hundreds of resumes are reviewed to fill just one position. 

 

The bottom line – the hiring process isn’t about you.  It’s about the organization, their needs, and ultimately their success.  I recommend that as a candidate, you view the entire process from the point of view of the hiring team.  What will they want to see on a resume?  What kind of person will fit well within the organization or on that specific team?  What intangibles might they be looking for in the interview process?

 

You may indeed be very talented.  In fact, you might be the most talented person you know…really!  That doesn’t mean that you’re the best FIT for the job opening.  If you don’t get hired, do not be discouraged…you will be the best fit during another search. 

 

If you have a realistic view of your own abilities, and understand that the job search process isn’t really about you, you won’t be disappointed at open doors that close….you’ll understand that some other door will open and have your name on it.

 

For another perspective on this study of ego within Generation Y, and the impact of this narcissistic epidemic on our society, I recommend an editorial from the Daily 49er, the student newspaper at Cal State Long Beach (Get Over Yourselves).

 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 3/27/2007 9:11 PM Gene Kholodenko wrote:
    Interesting viewpoint. I happen to disagree. A significant percentage of the rejections I have seen as a dispassionate third party observer (i.e. it wasn't me or my friends being rejected) are often unexplained to the candidates. The reasons for the lack of the explanation vary from legal considerations (i.e. are they going to sue me because I was blunt in telling them their deficiencies) to management time constraints (i.e. I don't have the time of day to tell every person why they are not a fit). Legal arguments aside, what I believe is right from a human perspective is to tell, at least the candidates that gave you pause enough to consider them, why they are not a fit. Realistically, this plays out better for internal company processes and postings than externally. If a company truly cares about growing its people, the hiring managers should take the time to explain (within legal and competitive boundaries, of course) why they made a certain call. If I am ever rejected, I'd sure want to know why, so I can learn from it.

    The unfortunate reality is that the vast majority of the applicants will not actually get a response in today's world. You're right that if they expect little, they won't be disappointed. This is true of anything in life. I choose to expect more from the people and companies I value and respect. In my experience, those worthy of such respect care enough to offer me feedback I can use, even if it is painful.
    Reply to this
  • 3/2/2010 12:08 PM Fleek wrote:
    Thanks for your thoughts Gene. We discussed your post via e-mail when this was originally posted, but I wanted to leave a comment here for public consumption.

    I think internal candidates do deserve timely feedback and coaching when they are not selected for a job posting. The experiences outlined above attempted to address primarily external candidates. While direct feedback to external candidates would certainly be beneficial to them in future interview processes, the reality is that companies do not generally provide any amount of helpful feedback. Organizations understand that employment litigation comes from what is said, not from what is left unspoken. Especially in today's job market where we're seeing so many applicants per posting, an expectation of an external candidate to receive any kind of feedback from the hiring organization seems unrealistic.

    It should be noted that when a 3rd party recruiting org is involved providing feedback directly to the candidate is far more possible and even expected. When I'm acting as a 3rd party recruiter I very much enjoy the opportunity to coach candidates I'm working with. Hopefully they'd say it's helpful!
    Reply to this
  • 5/6/2010 3:21 PM Wayne wrote:
    I frequently disagree with many external 3rd party recruiters when they post information on sites such as this one. However, I found this article to be right on the money. Good job

    Gene - walk for a day in an HR Generalist shoes - someone who has several jobs open - along with all of the other responsibilities - getting 50 - 150 resumes per job - most of them not even close to meeting the qualificaitons - then you can question why everyone doesn't get a personalized respones back.
    Reply to this
    1. 5/11/2010 11:05 AM Chris Fleek wrote:
      Wayne - thank you for your comments. I appreciate your feedback and your effort in reading this post from three years ago!
      Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.